
Best of the ISP-Lists
Unlimited vs. Dedicated Service
'Campers' and 'line hogs' can eat into your profits, and
they have ways of defeating automated procedures for keeping them in line.
What's an ISP do do?
In a thread on ISP-Tech, Wed., May 12 1999, JB
writes:
"As a growing ISP, we have come across an interesting
problem. We provide unlimited service, but there seems to be a price we
have to pay. We find users constantly 'hogging' lines. We're looking at
setting up a permanent policy to disconnect users after a certain time,
but that doesn't help with the auto-dialers, which we are seeing when
we disconnect these line-hogs.
My question is:
How do you express to your users the difference between unlimited and
dedicated service?
Respondents's answers generally addressed two related solutions.
Solution
1: Define limits
Many respondents pointed out the need for defining the term "unlimited
service," and stipulating specific limits:
[AS wrote] "Include a clause in
your Terms & Conditions (that every new subscriber must sign) stating
that the number of hours is unlimited, but when not in active use, the
connection must be terminated. Then when you see that someone's been inactive
for 30 or 40 hours, then just boot them off. If they complain, point them
to the Terms & Conditions they signed."
[JS wrote] "We too offer 'unlimited'
accounts, however, we define this in the TOS
as 'up to an average of 12hrs/day. We also have a 15min idle time out
in effect, and I have a tech go through the active ports several times
a day and disconnect the ones that have been online for hours and only
passed 90K of data. When we get people who are continually, actively using
an account 16+ hrs a day, we ask them to upgrade to a dedicated dial-up
account, since they are most likely running an FTP server."
[DS wrote] "Our TOS has the unlimited
live interactive clause, too. It also says that running servers without
our knowledge or camping gets them charged the $99 a month dedicated rate."
Go to Page 2
|